JW -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Thurs,
Jun 04, 1998 at 13:19:08 (EST)
__Robyn -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Thurs, Jun 04,
1998 at 15:57:41 (EST)
____Jean-Michel -:- Never
leave any room ..... -:- Thurs, Jun 04, 1998 at
17:33:00 (EST)
__VP -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Fri, Jun 05,
1998 at 00:14:14 (EST)
__david f. -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Fri, Jun 05,
1998 at 01:17:27 (EST)
____Mirabai -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Fri, Jun 05,
1998 at 04:36:08 (EST)
____Robyn -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Fri, Jun 05,
1998 at 10:45:17 (EST)
__John Hammond-Smyth -:-
Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
-:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 07:46:03 (EST)
____Richard -:- I'm
Thinking... -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 08:25:31
(EST)
____Robyn -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Fri, Jun 05,
1998 at 10:41:09 (EST)
______Jim -:- Robyn,
are you serious? -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at
11:14:29 (EST)
________Robyn -:- Robyn,
are you serious? -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at
12:13:48 (EST)
____Jim -:- Now
that's funny -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 11:12:38
(EST)
______Richard -:- Off
Topic...Raja and Claudia -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998
at 11:51:27 (EST)
________Jim -:- Off
Topic...Raja and Claudia -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998
at 14:04:25 (EST)
______John Hammond-Smyth -:-
Now that's funny -:- Fri, Jun
05, 1998 at 12:46:42 (EST)
____Joy -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Fri, Jun 05,
1998 at 11:28:53 (EST)
____Judex -:- Why
DON'T Premies Stay Around? -:- Fri, Jun 05,
1998 at 19:18:56 (EST)
______Jim -:- John
HS is a joke - literally! -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998
at 19:25:50 (EST)
________Judex -:- John
HS is a joke - literally! -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998
at 19:42:38 (EST)
__________Katie -:- John
HS is a joke - literally! -:- Fri, Jun 05, 1998
at 20:01:33 (EST)
|
Date: Thurs, Jun 04, 1998 at 13:19:08
(EST)
From: JW
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
Jim raised an interesting point down below, and
it's something I have noticed over the past year as
well. Occasionally, premies post on the forum,
engage in various levels of debate and discussion
with ex-premies, and then, invariably, split. There
are a couple of notable exceptions of people who
have MOVED from the 'premie' to the 'ex-premie,' or
at least 'wavering-premie,' category who stick
around for moral support, but the seeming die-hard
devotees seem to go away and never come back to
posting. Mili is the only exception I can think of,
but I think Mili is really a unique premie, IMHO.
He is so removed from the premie world, that he is
hardly even a premie, IMHO.
So, why do you think that is? I tend to agree with
Jim that in every premie is a suppressed, possibly
very weak, desire to know the truth, and the premie
on some level knows there is something very fishy,
unsatisfying, and downright contradictory about BM
and his cult. That part of them also knows that
they really want to be free from it. They are
scared by and attracted to that part of themselves
at the same time. I can recall this feeling in
myself as a premie. [I remember when Sophia
Collier's book came out called 'Soul Rush' in about
1977. I got a copy of the book and took it
somewhere, not around premies, and read it. It was
like reading pornography. I was attracted, but felt
guilty about reading it. If I had been a 'true
devotee' I wouldn't have. I think this forum is
much like that.]
This forum, I think, is pretty irresistible to a
lot of premies for that reason. I think many
premies read this forum on a regular basis but
NEVER post. They can do this and retain the facade
that they are still, at least tacitly, premies,
because they have not ever allowed themselves to
verbalize the doubts they feel. They also fear that
BM or other premies will find out they DID post,
and that is scary to them, since BM's cult is
heavily built on fear. Hence, even the premies who
DO post, by and large, are paranoid about not
revealing who they are.
But some premies feel compelled to say something.
They feel compelled to put ex-premies down, because
it's all becomming too confronting and they need a
rationale to explain why ex-premies could be saying
things form personal experience that actually make
logical sense.
Has any other ex-premie had the experience of being
violently attacked (verbally at least) by a premie
after expressing your true feelings about M? I sure
have. And I think that's what the premies who post
are doing. They are trying to defend their
programmed trip, but the fact that they post is
kind of a last-ditch attempt to hold the trip
together. At least that's what I think. And when
they see, in black and white, how little sense
their defense makes, and how it's pulled apart by
people who know all about BM and his trip from
personal experience, they have to split. It becomes
just too confronting.
Anyone have any views on this?
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Thurs, Jun 04, 1998 at 15:57:41
(EST)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs
To: JW
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
Dear JW,
I tend to agree with Jim that in every premie is
a suppressed, possibly very weak, desire to know
the truth, and the premie on some level knows there
is something very fishy, unsatisfying, and
downright contradictory about BM and his cult. That
part of them also knows that they really want to be
free from it. They are scared by and attracted to
that part of themselves at the same time.
That has always been my impression of the premies
that post as well as those that lurk only.
. They are trying to defend their programmed
trip, but the fact that they post is kind of a
last-ditch attempt to hold the trip together. At
least that's what I think. And when they see, in
black and white, how little sense their defense
makes, and how it's pulled apart by people who know
all about BM and his trip from personal experience,
they have to split. It becomes just too
confronting.
And yes I agree that this is probably why they
split. What is the sense in staying unless they are
glutens for punishment. Some stay long enough to
suprize me and I wonder if any of them are here for
directed or percieved 'service' so they put
themselves in the firing line longer than is
healthy. Otherwise I really am confused as to why
they are here in the first place if their Master
told them not to be on the Net. They listen or not
depending on what, I don't understand that.
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Thurs, Jun 04, 1998 at 17:33:00
(EST)
From: Jean-Michel
Email: None
To: Robyn
Subject: Never leave any room .....
Message:
In premie language, I think you would finally
pull that 'don't leave any room for doubt in your
mind'
as the excuse for leaving.
I totally agree with your analysis.
This Forum is pure mind ..... in other words.
How could you 'follow your heart' and confront such
challenging
concepts ?
When your mind is in such a mess, to say it in real
language,
what can you expect ?
At least you can think that that strange mindset is
going to brake sooner or later, like it did for
more than 90% of the people who one day received
k.
I feel it's a very sad story.
And the BM is responsible for it.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 00:14:14
(EST)
From: VP
Email: None
To: JW
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
Some of the premies probably aren't around right
now because they are checking out the world tour. I
suspect that when that is over, more will be
posting with a vengence, or not at all, due to
'orders' not to do so. Either way, I know they will
be reading. Naughty is nice, after all.
I get the feeling that many of the premies who do
post here have this sort of half-committed view of
the BM trip. They don't really surrender. It's like
their favorite TV show, or their favorite sport.
It's a convenient kind of little hobby for them.
Nice and hidden away for when they want/need it.
Like a stash of drugs or something. It has been
given a little respectability now (not too much
though, sorry) with the suit and all that. It fits
in nicely with the 'if it works for me, I do it'
mentality. I could be wrong, but that is the
impression that I have gotten from a few of the
revisionist posters here.
They don't see it as a cult because that isn't how
it fits into their lifestyle. I know that there are
others (especially newcomers) who probably take it
much more seriously. Maybe that is another reason
they don't stick around. It isn't working for them
at the moment.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 01:17:27
(EST)
From: david f.
Email: None
To: JW
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
JW, I don't have a really good explaination,
except
* I really don't live on the web all that much,
and
* sometimes I check in and don't find anything of
interest or that I want to comment on.
perhaps others are similar, or simply find the site
interesting or useful for only a short period of
time.
best wishes, david f.
(p.s. hi again robyn.)
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 04:36:08
(EST)
From: Mirabai
Email: None
To: david f.
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
david f said 'JW, I don't have a really good
explaination, except
* I really don't live on the web all that much,
and
* sometimes I check in and don't find anything of
interest or that I want to comment on.
perhaps others are similar, or simply find the site
interesting or useful for only a short period of
time'
I can relate to the essence of these words. I've
enjoyed being challenged by this forum and it's
been amazing to be introduced to so many people
that were once involved with maharaji. I'd like to
think that I am willing to look at what the truth
is, no matter how I may or may not like it.
best regards Mirabai
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 10:45:17
(EST)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs
To: david f.
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
Dear David F.,
I don't know that you will see this but I don't
think you think of yourself as a premie, do you? I
believe you are just saying why anyone might not
stay around but there is a difference here, I
think, premies are not supposed to be here, orders
from the Master and they, from what little I've
read of their posts can't seem to just get into a
conversation, Keith came close in that he kept
trying but then he was working on coming to terms
with things that bothered him about the whole thing
with M which is a big no, no for premies that want
to stay 'in the fold'.
Robyn
Have a wonderful weekend, David.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 07:46:03
(EST)
From: John Hammond-Smyth
Email: padded.cell@asylum.com
To: JW
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
Premies don't stay around because your heart are
closed to the beauty and radience of Maharaji. Why
would we want to polute ourselves with your minds.
You are all in your minds and have not opened your
hearts to the Lord of Love. No amount of debate is
going to show you what we premies know - that
Maharaji is the imparter of true knowledge and
nobody can understand this unless they come with an
open heart.
Amigo has made a valient effort to impress upon you
about the need for the master but no, you think you
know best. You obviously didn't surrender like I
did. My doctors tell me that soon I'll be able to
have my lobotomy and then I'll be free of my mind
forever! How many here are willing to take such a
step of surrender.
Our Lord, Maharaji once said that every time you
think, you kick Maharaji in the teeth. Need I say
more.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 08:25:31
(EST)
From: Richard
Email: None
To: John Hammond-Smyth
Subject: I'm Thinking...
Message:
I knew I had a function.
THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK
THINK THINK
THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK
THINK THINK
THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK
THINK THINK
THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK
THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK THINK
etc...
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 10:41:09
(EST)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs
To: John Hammond-Smyth
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
Dear John,
Yadda, yadda, yadda, I don't wish you ill but I
don't even have to read your post to know what you
have to say, it has been said so many times before
and I leave it to the others to bang it about with
you. Sorry you haven't been able to go to any of
these recent events, don't you think festivals was
a much better/nicer/more human term?
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 11:14:29
(EST)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Robyn
Subject: Robyn, are you serious?
Message:
Robyn,
Mayb'e I'M missing something, but can't you see
that 'JHS' is just a joke?
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 12:13:48
(EST)
From: Robyn
Email: sundogs
To: Jim
Subject: Robyn, are you serious?
Message:
Dear Jim,
No silly, I was kidding!
Robyn
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 11:12:38
(EST)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: John Hammond-Smyth
Subject: Now that's funny
Message:
My doctors tell me that soon I'll be able to
have my lobotomy and then I'll be free of my mind
forever! How many here are willing to take such a
step of surrender.
Our Lord, Maharaji once said that every time you
think, you kick Maharaji in the teeth. Need I say
more.
John,
That's really good but, I have to ask you, did
Maharaji really say that? Like honestly, did he?
When? Where? (Like, this thing is so dumb to start
with, I have to admit I think it's actually
possible. I can picture it.)
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 11:51:27
(EST)
From: Richard
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Off Topic...Raja and Claudia
Message:
Hey Jim,
have I got you real-time? Can you help me with some
info. I keep hearing about Raja Ji and Claudia and
Maharaji. I was around Raja Ji for some time and
figured him for 100% loyal if naive but I never
heard anything about this. So what happened.
Regards
Richard
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 14:04:25
(EST)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Richard
Subject: Off Topic...Raja and Claudia
Message:
Richard,
I've told my little story a few times here but, in
a nutshell, I met Raja Ji for a drink the day after
I'd heckled him at a program in L.A. in the mid
80s. I'd stood up for a guy who Raja Ji was
patronizingly brushing off. Raja Ji was trying to
raise money for a place for Maharaji and this
premie was confused about the special devotional
relationship he wanted but which was no longer in
fashion on Maharaji's world. Raja Ji told him to
basically give the money and not worry about it. I
stood up from the baack and told him that that was
wrong as we'd all be trained to believe tah he and
his family were divine. We went back and forth a
bit (I must say, I was 'winning'. Maybe someone
reading this was there and remembers. It was a
program in the mid to late 80s in a hotel by LAX.
Raja Ji analogized his childhood and that of his
brother's to the movie 'The Last Emperor').
Anyway, I went up to the front after, introduced
myself and Raja Ji seemed impressed that I'd gotten
a law degree after the ashram. The next day, on his
way back to Malibu after gettinh his haircut in
Beverly Hills, he stoped by my office and we
retired to the Red Robin downstairs for a drink
(me, scothch, he, Perrier).
After a bit of small talk (Raja Ji bitched about
the small stipend Maharaji gave him as an
instructor then) we discussed Maharaji and all the
changes to date. At first, Raja Ji encouraged me to
consult with a couple of intiators he knew in the
Malibu area who were 'really good at working with
people confused by all the changes'. I told him
that was ridiculous, I just wanted some answers. I
got imaptient and said that it was his brother
(i.e. Maharaji) I should be talking with, not him.
He just looked at me for a moment, kind of
expressing some resignation (like a salesman
admitting that he just can't beat the competition)
and offered that he himself had tried to ask
Maharaji some of these questions (like who he
thinks he is, for one) but that Maharaji wouldn't
anser him either. His point was that it would be
hopeless trying.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 12:46:42
(EST)
From: John Hammond-Smyth
Email: padded.cell@asylum.com
To: Jim
Subject: Now that's funny
Message:
Maharaji said that about kicking him in the teeth
etc during an initiator's conference he was
hosting. I was told this by Arthur Brigham (Param
Premanand) who was at the conference.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 11:28:53
(EST)
From: Joy
Email: None
To: John Hammond-Smyth
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
I hope Maharaji has a good dentist lined up.
John H-S, you don't need a lobotomy, seems like
you've already had one.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 19:18:56
(EST)
From: Judex
Email: None
To: John Hammond-Smyth
Subject: Why DON'T Premies Stay Around?
Message:
Dear John Hammond-Smyth
Don't you think it takes a bit of an open heart
and mind to put ourselves on the line as we
do here, every day?
Sometimes we get angry and rude, but what kind of
guts do you think it takes for someone to set up
this Forum in the first place? Is this someone with
a closed heart, saying come one come all, and let's
talk about this experience which hurt many of us?
What category do you put that in. Does M ever ask
you how you feel? What your opinion is? What's
happening today? No, he says go inside, go inside.
go inside, go inside.
Just keep listening.
go inside, go in side. go........
and he asks you to support him and give him
collectively $10,000 a day for his personal use (if
this info is true). If he is inside as much as he
tells others to do, why would he need all this
money? Wouldnt a plain home with simple furnishings
be adequate? Well, maybe his home is like that but
with designer labels. You might say he needs to be
rich so his followers will all respect him. And to
their problems, he says go inside. The answers are
all there. The problems will seem not so important
when you look at your life in the context of
eternity.
Well in my opinion we here look at our lives in the
context of THIS VERY DAY I AM ALIVE and I am
HERE
Please keep reading. You might have a change of
heart.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 19:25:50
(EST)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Judex
Subject: John HS is a joke - literally!
Message:
You know, when I first came to understand that John
H.S. was a joke I was a little concerned that 'he'
might be putting inocent ex's through their paces
for nothing. But then, when he started revealing in
no uncertain terms that he was just a running gag,
I thought, 'that's fine. No one will unnecessarily
shadow box with the guy'.
Listen, I can tell you with absoltuely no doubt
whatsoever that JHS is a joke.
At this point I think it's a cute joke. He does it
well. But really, Judec, let there be no mistake.
This guy's not real. Please don't think
otherwise.
(Or is this a case like what happened with Robyn
where I tried to explain the same thing to her and
she told me that SHE was only joking too?)
Just trying to help.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 19:42:38
(EST)
From: Judex
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: John HS is a joke - literally!
Message:
Ok but here comes my excuse....
1. Ok I've just had a good laugh about it
2. Maybe someone's alter ego is trying to speak
through them. JHS really sounds sincere
sometimes.
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
Date: Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 20:01:33
(EST)
From: Katie
Email: None
To: Judex
Subject: John HS is a joke - literally!
Message:
John HS is the premie alter ego of a very nice
person on the forum. He learned to talk that way by
hanging around with premies who actually were LIKE
John HS! That's why it seems so real - there are a
bunch of John Hammond-Smythes running around in the
real world (and I bet they all wear white suits,
too!)
Return to Index -:- Top
of Index
|
|