alex -:- enjoy your life -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 16:45:52 (GMT)

__ janet -:- your post angers me deeply. can you handle it? -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 11:23:54 (GMT)

__ __ SB -:- Good Post!! Thanks. NT -:- Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:02:56 (GMT)

__ salam -:- Dear Alex -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:46:57 (GMT)

__ G -:- enjoy your life -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 22:50:24 (GMT)

__ __ SB -:- Only FEW: Said by the Master... -:- Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:25:12 (GMT)

__ suchabanana -:- same techs available - w/o bogus guru 'strings' -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:43:20 (GMT)

__ Jerry -:- enjoy your life -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:43:13 (GMT)

__ __ alex -:- enjoy your life -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:53:45 (GMT)

__ __ __ Jerry -:- I think you're wrong, Alex -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 17:27:45 (GMT)

__ cq -:- re 'finger pointing, whining and unresolved anger' -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:21:34 (GMT)

__ Jethro -:- enjoy your life -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 18:33:05 (GMT)

__ __ alex -:- enjoy your life -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:42:50 (GMT)

__ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- enjoy your life, alex -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:51:17 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ sivan -:- what's the fuss? -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:51:04 (GMT)

__ Way -:- Alex - questions and answers -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 18:07:08 (GMT)

__ __ alex -:- Alex - questions and answers -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:22:54 (GMT)

__ __ __ Bazza -:- So by your definition...... -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 05:39:38 (GMT)

__ __ __ Cynthia -:- Alex , Alex, Alex.... -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 20:12:46 (GMT)

__ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- Alex - questions and answers - you're an idealist -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:57:08 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- Alex - PS - ''a better alternative'' -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 20:04:52 (GMT)

__ __ __ Way -:- Alex - more questions and answers -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:47:50 (GMT)

__ Gregg -:- the 'better alternative' -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:12:31 (GMT)

__ Jim -:- The ol' Premie Mexican Standoff -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:02:58 (GMT)

__ __ alex -:- The ol' Premie Mexican Standoff -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:47:48 (GMT)

__ __ __ la-ex -:- Alex baby!With that sidestepping, you could work -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:42:03 (GMT)

__ __ __ Jerry -:- I've got another question -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:59:32 (GMT)

__ Nigel -:- The return of Mr Get-a-Life! -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 16:51:19 (GMT)

__ __ Helen -:- Yes but here is the worse type yet -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 22:18:12 (GMT)

__ __ __ JHB -:- Great post, but you spelt loosers wrong! (nt) -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:39:17 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Tami Rainbow -:- Great post, but you spelt loosers wrong! -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:57:38 (GMT)

__ __ Jim -:- Fuck! I should have read you first, Nige -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:04:58 (GMT)

__ __ __ Nigel -:- Fuck! I should have read you first, Nige -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:07:17 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- Fuck! I'm glad I read all of your posts first -:- Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 18:51:20 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ cerise -:- This has been a great thread guys! -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 05:40:56 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Katie H -:- we have to repeat ourselves, Cerise -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 17:01:40 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Abi -:- this damn thing -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 13:38:25 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ cerise -:- she may be -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 13:58:45 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Sherlock Holmes -:- Young Lady -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 08:43:16 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ cerise -:- Yes kind sire? -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:50:43 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Hal (Sherlock ) -:- Ok I'm on the wrong track again ! -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 17:24:20 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- Cerise, you sure have it figured out -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 06:09:15 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ alex -:- Cerise, you sure have it figured out -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 22:39:13 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ cerise -:- well sort of, not quite -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:03 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Abi -:- contact high + Indian food = -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 13:13:18 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ cerise -:- sure i had darshan Abi, like I said -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:05:01 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Abi -:- whatever... -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:24:04 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- Cerise, here are the answers to your questions -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 10:07:57 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ cerise -:- Thanks -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 15:07:42 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Jim -:- Have you thought about this, Cerise? -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 22:46:36 (GMT)

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Pat Conlon -:- Cerise: Rawat is perfect and Hitler loved Jews -:- Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 18:53:42 (GMT)

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 16:45:52 (GMT)
From: alex
Email: None
To: Everyone
Subject: enjoy your life
Message:


dear all

i have been visiting your site over the last few years.
so i just wanted to say a few things. i am a premie who is practicing and also going to events with maharaji. but first a question to michael dettmers and everyone else who cares to think about it.
some of you mention the fact that you still practice knowledge so how does that feel? obviously there is an experience otherwise you would have stopped by now.
this is what i feel. i received knowledge 26 years ago. i was in the ashram for the first 2 years after that the ashram left, i did not leave it. ( 1976 )
but ever since i received knowledge i have enjoyed it very much. in the beginning i did not really get the maharaji trip. i used to get uncomfortable with all the mass hysteria. over the years though i began to appreciate maharaji and the inspiration he provided. very early on i realized also that he was not perfect he actually said it himself for those who could hear.
so first of all i think that most of you guys out there never really experienced knowledge. and as a matter of fact most people today who are considering themselves active premies also don't have a clear understanding of knowledge. so i am staying away from all of that. the current organization is mostly a bunch of scared, confused, needy career oriented people. and in the absence of a solid experience that is inevitable.
but there are people who i respect and love who are in touch with themselves, who are not afraid to address the issues and who do have an experience of knowledge and that for me is what it is all about.
so i do appreciate the existence of ex-premie and the openness and frankness with which things are discussed. however i would like to remind you that it seems there is a lot of finger pointing and whining and unresolved anger out there and i think it still applies that when you point your one finger the three remaining ones point to yourself.
to conclude i think that when someone receives knowledge the first question is did it work as promised? and i am very aware that it takes a lot of effort and the right kind of effort and a lot of sincerity etc. so if knowledge works why not leave it at that? if knowledge does not work, walk away. why be obsessed with maharaji and everything else? get a live, learn, have some fun and take it all with a lot of grains of salt. and please, why not come up with an alternative that is better?
i am not aware that anybody has expressed anything like that. but then i have not read everything that is posted here.
so hopefully that can be a positive contribution to this site and good luck to all of you.

alex

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 11:23:54 (GMT)
From: janet
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: your post angers me deeply. can you handle it?
Message:

It absolutely enrages me when someone presumes to pop in here and thinks they've come to save us all, as if theyre some pitying angel looing in on the damned souls in hell.
It enrages me that you think we came here to whine and point fingers because we somehow 'didnt get it' or 'didn't experience the Knowledge' or 'never really practiced' it and that this is some kind of sour grapes club.
this site started out as a place where people who had been premies could meet others who had been premies and talk about it. in open talking, more and more became known here.
i say 'had been'premies. you prefer to draw a line around the change in perception that you beleive happens with practicing the techniques, and call that alone, the Knowledge, and you say that all the rest of it is something else.
lets start with your line then.
if those techniques really do transform a person's perceptions of life and make them more vulnerable, soft, receptive, gentle, and in all ways more innocent and childlike,
then the last thing that should ever happen in a social group made up of people like that, is abuse, pain, guilting,manipulation,takeing shamelss advantage of,browbeating, overworking and banishment.
if doing the meditation opens a person, can you understand how being subject to such cruelty would drive them to leave? why would they stay?
like trusting children, they--we--believed all we were told, and did what we were told. we were told to do things, and to beleive things, that were harmfull for us. the very opening and gentling you speak of, was then turned and used to hurt us, day in and day out.
you dont tell a trusting child put his hand in fire. you don't stand him in a third story window and give him a cape made out of a blanket and tell him if he jumps out, he will fly. you don't tell him if he runs fast enough, he can run between the cars and get across the street. you dont throw him into deep water and tell him he can breathe water just like the fish.

he will believe you, and do it, because you said so, and he believes you know everything. he certainly thinks you know more about everything than he does.

if he does not lose his life for trusting you and believing you, he will do just as you say--and instantly his own body will tell him what you told him isnt true, isnt good for him, hurts, feels all wrong, is something he must never do again.
if he survives the burn to his hand, the breaks in his bones, the injuries to his body, the near drownng in the deep water, he will have learned not to trust you again and trustwhat his own body and sense tells him.
how much bigger is it if someone comes down the pike and declares he can show you god, that he comes to bring peace to the world in your lifetime, and if you give your life over to him utterly, it will happen?
if you trust him, if you believe him, if you do as he says, and your own body tells you that this isnt good, this is harmful, that this hurts, that it isnt so at all--is it any mystery why you would back away and leave, and tell others as well?
is it surprsing if you should meet another who was in the same thing, that you should ask each other and tell each other what it was like for you?

if it ever was what we were told it was, it would not now look and feel like this.
this, meaning like this site is, and 'this, meaning what maharaji and the premies and EV and the whole sordid mission now looks and feels like.
it would look very, very different.
first of all, maharaji himself does not use 'the knowledge'. he doesnt meditate. he is not remotely like the state you have chosen to describe as resulting from the techniques. you talk about 'your true self'. is that what he shows everyone? well if that's true, and he's the leader showing how to live in that state, i hope he dies soon or goes to prison, because if the world turned into all people operating like he does, not even a family could last long enough to bring children into the next generation. the human race would die out in a war of ego, selfishness, consumption, profligate waste, uncaring, using, abusing, conscience-less self gratification and ennui.
you talk about respect. maharaji has none, for anyone. when his wife nearly died, three times, from an aneurism, a weak spot in her blood vessel, ballooning out, and then bursting, and flooding blood in her brain, he adressed her as if it had been something she did deliberately, 'to' them all. as if she could have decided not to do it!

we all were full premies, here. we all know the same stuff you know. we all realized knowledge. we gave our trust. we did what we were told to. we believed our teacher/master/guru/leader/salesman/ we went without sleep, without adequate food, medical care, dental care, shut out our families, left jobs, educations, crossed the world and came back, believing this guy and his promise.

until our bodies, our true selves, told us clearly to stop it. our own senses told us not to believe this, not to do this, anymore.
and it was only then that we began to put together the true story of what this guy has been doing with our trust, all these years.
he asked for money to spread knowledge to the world. we gave money. but thats not what it got used for.
it went into his pocket for him to waste on his own appetites while we starved.

he is a monstrosity. we made it possible. it is our responsibility to the world to unmake what we created of him. without us, our money, our belief, our willingness, our work, without premies, he is nothing.
if we take back all we gave, he will again be nothing.
it will be good for him.
if knowledge works, as you say, he will know utterly and for certain, then. if it is truly all one needs in life, then he certainly will have the only thing he needs.

thats how his father did it. it was good enough for him.
the knowledge is not his. he can take it to the world,if he wants to, yes, by all means, do so. but it is not his. if i want to teach the whole world about the alphabet, i can do that. but its not my alphabet. no one owns it. could i justify and defend collecting millions of dollars from people i taught the alphabet to, telling them i have to take it to the whole world, and instead i keep spending that money on watches and jets and yachts and mansions and
jewelry for my wife and my kids and the sexiest of my female students....
and i tell them they must never reveal what i taught them to anyone else, only i can do that---
and then they find out that it is taught for free in whole continents for nothing, its common knowledge, no secret, and that they have wasted 30 years of their life doing whaat i said and believing what i said...
yes they would be furious. with good reason.

here we are, alex.

you've been 'had'. so have we all.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:02:56 (GMT)
From: SB
Email: None
To: janet
Subject: Good Post!! Thanks. NT
Message:

NT

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:46:57 (GMT)
From: salam
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: Dear Alex
Message:

Very nice of you to remind us of how many fingers we have. I noticed that you have been doing a lot of thinking lately. You really should do more meditation instead.

Just to remind you that there is a web atiquiete that goes like this: In My Opinion (IMO) or In My Humble Opinion (IMHO) or In MY Not So Humble Opinion (IMNSHO), well I can go on if you want.

So, you think we are a bunch of loosers? Never mind. Hang around and keep posting for a while and see what happens,

Salam the ex-looser

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 22:50:24 (GMT)
From: G
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: enjoy your life
Message:

'i was in the ashram for the first 2 years after that the ashram left, i did not leave it.'

After that, did you move back in the ashram? If not, why?

'...i did not really get the maharaji trip.'

And now you do 'get the maharaji trip'? I take it that you agree that it's a trip.

'mass hysteria'

This hysteria was fostered and encouraged by Rawat.

'... he was not perfect ...'

Ok, name three ways in which he is not perfect.

'...never really experienced knowledge...don't have a clear understanding of knowledge...'

And you think you do? Why don't you capitalize it? Rawat does. Are you saying it's less than what he bills it as?

'a bunch of scared, confused, needy career oriented people'

Well if Rawat were such a good teacher (Oh, I forgot, now he's not a teacher) you would think they wouldn't be so scared, confused, and needy. Suppose there were a math teacher and all his students were failing, wouldn't it be reasonable to suspect that there's something wrong with his teaching? Like maybe he's teaching them that 2 + 2 = 5. Why blame the students? No wonder he says he's not a teacher.

'...not afraid to address the issues...'

For instance?

'when you point your one finger the three remaining ones point to yourself'

Just because I'm not perfect doesn't mean that I don't have the right to point out Mr. Rawats faults, especially since he's pretending to be more enlightened than he is. Sometimes my faults are pointed out and it does me good. This is such a thing as constructive criticism and it applies to him.

'did it work as promised?'

No, he billed it as the 'Knowledge of God' that he could show, not just as a way to calm down, feel good, or become sedated. He said 'I can show you God.' The sounds were billed as 'Celestial Harmonies', 'Divine Music' and such, the light, which I don't think is essentially different than normal sensations of light, as 'the Divine Light of God', the feeling of breathing as the 'Holy Name'. Sure, it feels good to breath, but that's not because of a Mr. Prem Rawat. I find that focusing on my breath works better if I combine it with stretching, which he has never recommended. That's right, he's never recommended any kind of physical exercise to feel better. If fact, I exercised less because of him.

'walk away'

That's code for 'Don't expose him.' That boat don't float.

 

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:25:12 (GMT)
From: SB
Email: None
To: G
Subject: Only FEW: Said by the Master...
Message:

Don't you get it? If you think you are one of those few you are truly especial! Alex is one.

Mahalard said many times (I have a casette) that only few will realize what k really is. Humble...(bullshit) BTW, that is a good way to feep ANY devotee. Moving the carrot I call it. Try harder, give more, do more and then you may get it. Be devoted, centered, clear, as David Smith put it. To day I call it empty. That is where you are gone. When a premie becomes a puppet she/he can't see who is moving the strings; the premie is too busy surrendering, being a devotee. Lard tells premies NOT to QUESTION, right? I wonder why. After all, only few are going to get it.

In that program (mentioned casette) and I was there, maharaji rawat created a great impression in people's minds because I remember people were talking and talking about it after the program ended. It created fear that one may not get it; the vegetable satsang comes in mind as a deterrant to leave... It was for me to keep on trying at least, even if I felt I may be wrong and what I was experiencing wasn't it. More humility was needed then. I was a devotee after all, like Alex. Mahalard clearly has said MANY times that to serve the master is the most important thing a premie can do. What do premies like Alex think all the garbage they hear from mahalard goes? It sinks in and well. Then you talk and behave just as he wants you too...Alex is one of 'them' alright. Sucked.

HOW SUBLIME! THE GURU IS FAKE and is using premies energies to sustaing himself and in a gross way brainwashes people to become his servants and we are whinning? Yeap, Alex got it right. NOT!

Hi G!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:43:20 (GMT)
From: suchabanana
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: same techs available - w/o bogus guru 'strings'
Message:

Dear Alex:

Some of us have seen inner light for 40+ years, heard the inner sounds ditto, years before ever hearing of Prem Rawat, and some of us have found all 4 techs readily available elsewhere in books (e.g. Vedic, Buddhist, Sufi texts, etc.) and presented by common unassuming yoga instructors - recognizing that there is NO need whatsoever for worship/dedication to a false [or any] guru -- especially someone who used distortions, manipulations, and enforced a false monopoly -- r.e. these basic meditation techs, and people's OWN personal experiences based on their OWN sincerity -- to enrich himself and his family and suck premies dry - while gorging on their diverted non-profit donations like an unscrupulous blood-sucking leech, to the tune of more than $100 million.

Prem also committed a witnessed criminal 'hit and run' where he killed someone and split the scene and had a premie take the blame (in India, as related by Dettmers), and he personally ordered Donner/DLM to expedite the aiding and abetting of top DLM fugitive aides/mahatmas from the law, who had conspired and then tried to murder reporter Pat Halley in Detroit in August, 1973 --

Alex, that's just for starters...

You know, some of us have been meditators for about 30 years, while others bagged it finally. To each their own. However, 'you know who' is clearly unworthy to masquerade as anyone's Master. For some people, it takes a certain amount of detachment from the cult, and the resources of information now available at EPO and some other websites - to get the whole picture about the unholy scams and coverups that have been perpetrated by the Rawat gang abusing the Name of God. Prem is just a bhaktijuju guru combo of Jim Jones, Bakker, Swaggert, Rajneesh-Osho-Tojo, LR Hubbard KGB, Bring'em plenty and Bring'em Young, Blubber Free John-Adidan, Sly Baba, Savanarola, and big-bucks payola.

And let no one ever again confuse one's own inner experiences of whatever meditation techs with the propaganda and deluded Napoleonic ramblings of a callous, grossly Maya-addicted guru/aka Master. I actually forgave the guy, but I certainly don't forget, and he and EVI [formerly DLM] must at least be held accountable for the harboring of pedophiles, the huge amounts of diverted non-profit donation money, and other wrongdoings. The fundamental facts presented on this site are not bs -- they're true. Check 'em all out yourself - like I did (and others).

If one wishes to believe in a higher power [aka God] and meditate - no problem with me or lots of others here, whatsoever. In fact, Good Luck - and enjoy your life, too...

Peace and lentils,

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:43:13 (GMT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: enjoy your life
Message:

to conclude i think that when someone receives knowledge the first question is did it work as promised?

That might be your advice but it sure isn't Maharaji's. As far as Maharaji is concerned, Knowledge 'works' for everybody. He contends that those who say it doesn't just can't accept it. Do you agree?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:53:45 (GMT)
From: alex
Email: None
To: Jerry
Subject: enjoy your life
Message:

hi jerry,

thanks for your reply.
its a tricky question. and it is very old. krishna tells arjun 'drawing back the restless and fidgety mind from all the objects after which it runs, he should repeatedly fix it on god.' 6/26 and arjun pretty much gave up. so krishna says again ' the mind is restless no doubt, and difficult to curb, but it can be brought under control by repeated practice and by the exercise of dispassion.' 6/ 35
so who is wrong and who is right?
i think knowledge works but it takes a lot of effort at least it does for me. so i am not surprised if someone says it does not work and gives up. and then they would be right that it did not work for them.

alex

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 17:27:45 (GMT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: I think you're wrong, Alex
Message:

And I also think you judge those who give up unfairly. How do you know how much effort we put in? It seems to me that you have a pre-conceived notion that Knowledge does work, provided that the proper effort is applied. I use to buy into this (and it was what kept me going for the longest time), but after 18 years of trying just one more time with just a little more effort, I think I can say, in all honesty, that I gave Knolwedge a 'fair chance', to quote Maharaji. So, if I were you, I would reconsider this idea you have that the proper amount of effort pays off.

What I would also like you consider is -- if this is the Knowledge of God, how come it 'works' for some and not for others? Why would God create me, fill me with a longing to know him, and then deny me the fulfillment of that longing if Knowledge is the means to achieve it? Because of a lack of effort, Alex? The effort is in the longing as far as I can tell. If that longing is not fulfilled, then obviously, you're looking in the wrong place. It won't matter how much effort you put into it, it's like trying to squeeze water from a stone. But try telling that to Maharaji.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:21:34 (GMT)
From: cq
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: re 'finger pointing, whining and unresolved anger'
Message:

you're absolutely right, there is a lot of 'finger pointing, whining and unresolved anger' on the Forum, but I have to point out that your use of the word 'whining' indicates (at least to me) that you apparently think people shouldn't be allowed to express their dissatisfaction. No doubt the likes of George W Bush, Tony Blair and Saddam Hussein (inter alia) would like to claim that all criticism of their policies is nothing but 'whining'.

There is a lot to be said, however, of being aware of the 'victim' mentality. Perhaps the innate dependency-creating aspect of M's message has a lot to answer for, as far as that is concerned.

Or would I be yet another victim of transference in thinking that the dependence on him (that he undeniably encourages) is somehow my fault? Well, anything 'negative' about the cult is always someone else's fault, isn't it?

Perhaps it wouldn't be too uncharitable to think of such symptoms of post-cult/guru/master involvement as being an unpleasant, yet evidently real part of distancing oneself from a one-time leader who now denies ever having been a leader (according to Maharaji's website).

The unresolved anger. Now that's another matter.

Who do you think ex-premies should get angry at?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 18:33:05 (GMT)
From: Jethro
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: enjoy your life
Message:

Alex,
Firstly I am not one of those who 'pratice knowledge'. In fact I stopped using the term while I was still a follower of prem rowatt. So I can't really answer your questions.


But I do have a couple of questions for you.

1, What do YOU mean by 'practicing knowledge'?.. in fact what do YOU mean by 'knowledge'?(This is not intended to be facecious, I really think the above phrases are used differently by different people.)

2, You say that you realize that m is not perfect and is human. So, how do you feel about him protecting a paedophille and his complete silence on the whole subject?

3, you say'as a matter of fact most people today who are considering themselves active premies also don't have a clear understanding of knowledge.'
Now that is a really interesting statement. Please tell me how you know these people don't have a clear understanding?

Thanks Jethro

 

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:42:50 (GMT)
From: alex
Email: None
To: Jethro
Subject: enjoy your life
Message:

hi jethro,

thanks for your reply,

maybe check my post to 'way' about questions one and three.
as for question two i don't think m. encourages this type of behavior. what has been done by élan vital or m. to help resolve this case i don't know. if there is an investigation by the police and élan vital and m. is cooperating i would consider it sufficient. if m. is expected to make statements about all the crazy things premies have done over the years i think he would be very very busy. not to mention that he does not seem to have the greatest track record in his own personal life. and if i were in his position i would probably prefer to focus on my stated mission which is to make knowledge available.

alex

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:51:17 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: enjoy your life, alex
Message:

Hi Alex, you said: ''...and if i were in his position i would probably prefer to focus on my stated mission which is to make knowledge available.''

I am one of those who still practice knowledge and have for 30 years and enjoy it a lot. But I don't think M is doing a very good job of ''making K available'' in the west.

He may be successful in India and elsewhere among the Indian ex-pats but I think as long as he is pushing the importance of focussing on the ''Master'' in the west that this will actually put sensible poeple off.

Ditto everything you said about the current PWKs. I think they are like that because their focus is not practice but the Master. For me it is very uncomfortable to have a ''Master'' especially somone who, as you say, ''does not seem to have the greatest track record in his own personal life.''

I prefer to get high with a little help from my friends.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:51:04 (GMT)
From: sivan
Email: -
To: all
Subject: what's the fuss?
Message:

If u ask most people - they experience k without any techs.
I think most ,who I ask, see light.
Nearly everyone hears the old cricket sound.
Anyone who does basic yoga gets the breath thing.
Most of us us old premies were going thru' the hormonal upheaval of puberty and all the attached psycho/mania ( for some).
It was really easy to put it all down to the magical- feels like finally growing up to see thru' it.
About 20 years ago, someone said to me- being into a cult or drugs stops your development during those years and your ability to mature. I couldn't see it at time , but see the cult disability aspect now.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 18:07:08 (GMT)
From: Way
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: Alex - questions and answers
Message:

Alex,

Will you answer these three questions:

(1)What do you mean by saying that 'Knowledge works'?

(2)You seem to be claiming that you can judge whether or not somebody else is experiencing Knowledge? How can you do that?

(3)Do you believe that people who are students of Mr. Rawat are the only people who are having that experience?

I will try to answer two of your questions:

(1) About why some ex-premies are what you call 'obsessed with Maharaji.' First, I think that is a bad term. We are not so much obsessed with Maharaji as we are simply very concerned about what we see as the con job that he is perpetrating on people. We want to let people know about his lies. We feel that when he instructs people to accept him as the Master, he is doing much more harm than good. People need to be empowered with truth and consciousness and joy, yes indeed, but they need to find their connection directly and not through Mr. Rawat or any of the other hundreds of false gurus out there. This is our perspective. This is why we don't just walk away and forget about it. Even if you have a different perspective, I think you can understand that, yes?

(2) What is the experience of Knowledge like for an ex? I meditated for about two years before I heard about Guru Maharaj Ji. Then I practiced the four techniques for about five years. Then, while I was still living in the ashram, I gave away my baragon and abandoned all the hand and tongue postures of Knowledge (considering them a distraction rather than a help) and simply concentrated within myself to the silence and the light. I rejected Rawat as the Master about four years ago. The experience I have of 'Knowledge' or of my own inner soul, whatever you want to call it, has not varied in all those years. The quiet is the same, the light is the same, the peace is the same, the joy is the same.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:22:54 (GMT)
From: alex
Email: None
To: Way
Subject: Alex - questions and answers
Message:

way,

thanks for your reply,

first your first and third question.
funny enough you already answered them in your second paragraph. you seem to be enjoying your inner experience so it seems knowledge does work for you. knowledge being your own true inner self and you being able to connect with it. never mind the technicalities of techniques.
since you are not actively involved with maharaji it seems obvious that you can have an experience whether you are with m. or without and that seems to answer the question about exclusivity.
how do i judge whether somebody has an experience or not? for me somebody who is in touch with his true nature starts to express kindness, openness, respect, joy etc. not because he or she is trying to but they start to emanate naturally. like a flower that is at the peak of bloom will emanate a fragrance. actually that is what i feel devotion is as well. devotion does not manifest for somebody but is a natural consequence of clarity and manifests without judgment. it as a wonderful state of being.

alex

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 05:39:38 (GMT)
From: Bazza
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: So by your definition......
Message:

for me somebody who is in touch with his true nature starts to express kindness, openness, respect, joy etc. not because he or she is trying to but they start to emanate naturally. like a flower that is at the peak of bloom will emanate a fragrance. actually that is what i feel devotion is as well. devotion does not manifest for somebody but is a natural consequence of clarity and manifests without judgment. it as a wonderful state of being.(emphasis mine)

....NONE of the other premies who post here are actually experiencing THAT feeling, THAT love. Kinda sad isn't it?

Just wondering how long your ambivalent attitude will hold up when the quesions here start to hit home a bit deeper. We've seen it happen many times - premies come in exuding love and light and end up calling us all the names under the sun when the real truth about maharajji starts getting under their skins

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 20:12:46 (GMT)
From: Cynthia
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: Alex , Alex, Alex....
Message:

Alex said:

how do i judge whether somebody has an experience or not? for me somebody who is in touch with his true nature starts to express kindness, openness, respect, joy etc. not because he or she is trying to but they start to emanate naturally. like a flower that is at the peak of bloom will emanate a fragrance. actually that is what i feel devotion is as well. devotion does not manifest for somebody but is a natural consequence of clarity and manifests without judgment. it as a wonderful state of being.

Alex, your statements are concepts (remember those?). How do you know everything about everyone's experience of so-called Knowledge and wrap them into a bundle and make a statement such as you did above? Maharaji doesn't have a special key. He lied to us. That's only one reason we very boldly point the finger at him and ask 'What are/have you been doing for the past 30 years?'

Some ex-premies do practice various types of meditation, including the techinques which M offers. Btw, HE doesn't own them, they are ancient techniques. When I was involved in the cult, I was an ashram premie and I was in full devotional mode. Yes, I practiced the K, the techniques and had experiences. So what? So what? That's immaterial to the question at hand.

Do you know M personally? Have you ever seen him in action behind the facade of a staged performance? Have you ever questioned his motives, and btw, do you know he bought a $7 million yacht, just for fun, but off the backs of premies' efforts? Do you still entertain the belief he is Lord of the Universe, Perfect Master, etc.? Do you give him money? If not, why not? If so, why?

How do you reconcile a man (Maharaji, Prempal Singh Rawat) as being a man? No ''man or woman'' harbors a pedophile, a malicious, sick individual, such as ''Mahatma (great soul)'' Jageo, who sexually abused the children of his devotees and did nothing! Maharaji has known about his for years and has brushed it off as if it is meaningless. Well, sexually abusing children is far from meaningless and Maharaji and Jagdeo still have not admitted publicly or at least privately, to Jagdeo's victims that they were seriously injured by an agent of M.

And, why blame the messengers? That's all the ex-premies are. Yes, we make fun of him, to allay our grief at his outrageous behavior and betrayals over the many years we devoted our lives to him.

Neither Michael Dettmers nor Michael Donners have anything to gain (quite the opposite) by posting here and revealing first hand, witnessed accounts of Maharaji's ammoral, immoral, and criminal behavior over the years.

Did you know that Maharaji hit and run (killed a premie) and got away with it in India? Or is he exempt from all criminal behavior because he gives you a feeling of becoming kind, and opening like a flower.

You know, I have a life which is quite good. I enjoy it, too. Does that surprise you? The world of Maharaji is extremely closed compared to the options and experiences we can have without being in a personality cult. The mind is not the devil as M continues to say.

That said, I suggest you go back and read all about the pedophile, Jagdeo and what he did to Susan and Abi, and by many accounts, many, many other children, some who are still so emotionally damaged (even in adulthood) cannot come forward. Are you aware what child sexual abuse does to a person throughout their life? Especially when committed by a person in the positino of power in which Maharaji placed Jagdeo?

Btw, Jagdeo still is living free, has not had to answer for his crimes to legal authorities, nor has he ever apologized to his victims. Why? To protect Maharaji and especially himself. Pedophiles tend to not have consciences. They have a mutually exclusive pact IMO: Maharaji has never acknowledged to the victims of Jagdeo that they were wronged, and they have received no compensation of ANY KIND, to allay their lifelong suffering. Jagdeo lives in India, probably still perping kids, and what has Maharaji done? NOTHING! What do you think of that?

I personally don't accept that Maharaji is even a teacher--I think he's too screwed up personally to be anyone's teacher. Based on eyewitness accounts posted here, he's a drunk, has abused his power by using female premies as his sex toys, has harbored a sex offender, and, as I recently discovered from Dettmers, used to spoon feed Cognac to his infants and toddlers, Yes, his OWN CHILDREN!

In my opinion Maharaji gets absolutely no credit for any experience you or anyone else has ever had with K, because he is a liar and a fraud. It's in YOU, Alex. It has nothing to do with Maharaji--he's just a crutch.

Cynthia

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:57:08 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: Alex - questions and answers - you're an idealist
Message:

You said practicing K makes you want to ''express kindness, openness, respect, joy...''

Join the ranks of the idealists here. There aren't too many left among the PWKs. There are a few but most have become so focussed on loving the ''Master'' that they have little time to love one another or to spread that love. Most of them don't really want to propagate K. And those who do have been silenced by M and can bo longer speak from their hearts byt have to do it with ''propagation packages.''

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 20:04:52 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: pdconlon@yahoo.com
To: alex
Subject: Alex - PS - ''a better alternative''
Message:

The alternative, if you are not 100% happy with M or the PWKs, is to teach Knowledge yourself. You sound like a wonderful, warm and sensible person and would make a terrific teacher. I intend to do it if any of my friends are interested.

I spent 17 years not telling anybody about K because I was so ashamed of M and the PWKs. But I enjoy K and will share it with my loved ones.

Please feel free to email me if you want to. I wish you clarity, consciousness and contentment.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 19:47:50 (GMT)
From: Way
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: Alex - more questions and answers
Message:

Alex,

Well, no, I could not have answered my own questions, because my questions were specifically what do YOU mean when you say 'Knowledge works.' I already know what I think.

However, from your response, I do start to understand your perspective, which does not seem to demand exclusivity to Rawat and those four particular techniques. And, if I am reading you correctly, what you mean by 'Knowledge works' is simply that a person enjoys the inner experience they get when practicing it.

Given what I now see as your perspective, I am afraid I have a little bad news for you. You are an extremely rotten mouthpiece for Prem Pal Rawat and I will have to report you to his authorities immediately. Let me remind you that Rawat's Knowledge is the Raj Vidya, the place where the finite merges with the Infinite. No mortal can reach this place deep within without devotion to the living Master. That's quite impossible. No one can even be taught the four techniques without the proper understanding about the absolute necessity for the living Master.

Gratious heavens, if we are to believe in your perspective, Alex, then all those premies who have been initiated by Satpal - (aka Bal Bhagwan Ji - see his website Manav Dharam) - they might also be able to realize this perfect Knowledge, without Prempal's assistance in any form. You don't mean to say that, do you???? Gee whiz, what kind of a devotee are you anyway? I regret to say this, but I think your smart card should be revoked. I do hope you are planning on attending the Amaroo festivities - they might get you back on track.

By the way, Alex, you seem to have gotten a slightly wrong impression about the reasons that ex-premies reject Rawat. It is not because he is a normal human being and therefore imperfect (which is, as you say, rather forgiveable); but that he is an outright fraud and a pathological liar and he behaves in a manner that no human being should ever behave in.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:12:31 (GMT)
From: Gregg
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: the 'better alternative'
Message:

Premies mostly agree on the meaning of life, ex-premies don't. We find out our own truths, and are happier doing so.

This site has many purposes. One of them is to encourage premies like you to learn who Maharaj Ji really is. Learning about the nature of this fraudulent 'Master,' we'd hope you might honestly confront your reasons for clinging to this belief system.

Many of us still meditate (though few of us still use the 4 techniques), but feel greater freedom and fulfillment now that we no longer follow the religion of Maharajism. Really, now, aren't you ready to graduate from spiritual kindergarten?

Sorry if I sound elitist and patronizing, but, knowing what you do about Maharaji (if you've cruised around this site at all), I can't understand how you could give credence to anything he says.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:02:58 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: The ol' Premie Mexican Standoff
Message:

Hey, fella, I just dare you to try reconcile these two statements:

'i think that most of you guys out there never really experienced knowledge. and as a matter of fact most people today who are considering themselves active premies also don't have a clear understanding of knowledge. so i am staying away from all of that. the current organization is mostly a bunch of scared, confused, needy career oriented people.'

with:

'i would like to remind you that it seems there is a lot of finger pointing and whining and unresolved anger out there and i think it still applies that when you point your one finger the three remaining ones point to yourself.'

I love it!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:47:48 (GMT)
From: alex
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: The ol' Premie Mexican Standoff
Message:

hi jim,

good point,
u did not really answer my question about practising knowledge though.
to your point. i like to distinguish between facts and judgement.
facts come from observations, judgements from our reaction to those facts.
just like it may be a fact that maharaji does all the things people claim he does what is my judgement of him?
should i condemm him or apriciate the fact that he gives knowledge to people and inspires them. once i accept he is human just like you and me i prefer to apriciate his efforts. just like i appriciate anybodys efforts that is sincere ( as much or as little as they are and that is for them to know ). and maybe forgive his shortcomings, not overlook but forgive. because it is not different for me. when i can start to accept my shortcomings i am the one who benefits.
so i have no problem in beeing critical, sarcastic etc. so long as i don't start to judge.

alex

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:42:03 (GMT)
From: la-ex
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: Alex baby!With that sidestepping, you could work
Message:

for EV!

First, you ignore the point Jim makes(well, you acknowledged his point, then proceed to completely ignore it).

Then, you say it's ok to be sarcastic and critical, as long as you don't judge??

Third, you say that M's bad actions only show that he is human, just like all of us?

I don't know ANYBODY who acts like that asshole acts towards others...
If you believe in something like the concept of 'karma', do you ever wonder what kind of 'karma' M is accruing?
Or is he the Master, and above it all??

Just wondering...

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 21:59:32 (GMT)
From: Jerry
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: I've got another question
Message:

Alex,

As far as you seem to care, Maharaji could be the biggest dickhead in the world, but you still 'appreciate' his efforts. Let me ask you this; how can somebody be such a dickhead, yet at the same time be the guy whose imparting the experience of 'true self'? It just doesn't seem to add up.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 16:51:19 (GMT)
From: Nigel
Email: None
To: alex
Subject: The return of Mr Get-a-Life!
Message:

and i think it still applies that when you point your one finger the three remaining ones point to yourself

You said it. Think about it.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 22:18:12 (GMT)
From: Helen
Email: None
To: Nigel
Subject: Yes but here is the worse type yet
Message:

Yup. Too true. Actually I liked Alex's post (it seemed more sincere) than the variety I've seen here of late. Here's the type (much exagerated, I know):

I am a beautiful blonde lawyer who lives in the foothills of L.A. and I am fabulously successful. And yes, I am a premie. My husband is a handsome and brilliant cardiologist, and did I mention fabulously successful? We have had knowledge for 23 years and it is not inhibited our ability to be fabulously successful in the world. We contribute to charity in our spare time and have 3 beautiful, brilliant and fabulously successful children. We are hoping to retire to our beautiful vacation home in Aspen where we plan to teach yoga, and make goatmilk spa products. Our lives are happy and blissful and we have so much to be grateful for. This knowledge has never impeded with our education or our ability to interact with and do business with a broad cross-section of people. And did I mention that we are fabulously successful?

I feel sorry for all you poor ex-es who obviously take the past way too seriously. You too, could be like me, and Blake (my husband) and have it all--all you've ever dreamed of. Well, go back to your little whiny party, I am going to get a facial and pedicure at Roxanna's Day Spa down on Rodeo Drive and then buy my spring wardrobe. Toodles, losers!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:39:17 (GMT)
From: JHB
Email: None
To: Helen
Subject: Great post, but you spelt loosers wrong! (nt)
Message:

LOL!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:57:38 (GMT)
From: Tami Rainbow
Email: None
To: JHB
Subject: Great post, but you spelt loosers wrong!
Message:

I notised that too. I don't see what wuz rong with that post anyway, why is Helen making fun of her? I am blond too and hope to be fabulus too, by His Grace. ANd get a sucksexful husband.

Love
Tami
(Are u rich???)

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:04:58 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: Nigel
Subject: Fuck! I should have read you first, Nige
Message:

Although, why you think it's so important to post what I'm going to post just before I get a chance to is beyond me.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 17:07:17 (GMT)
From: Nigel
Email: None
To: Jim
Subject: Fuck! I should have read you first, Nige
Message:

You're not paying attention are you? Saves forum space if we post on behalf of others.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 18:51:20 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: None
To: Nigel et al
Subject: Fuck! I'm glad I read all of your posts first
Message:

You all anticipated what I was going to say and I would have been taking up precious space. Thanks you. I'll let you guys divine my thoughts and post for me from now on.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 05:40:56 (GMT)
From: cerise
Email: None
To: Pat Conlon
Subject: This has been a great thread guys!
Message:

this has been a fabulous thread. thanks!
I really like Alex, you must be a cute guy! but enough of that he he. As usual with the responses the cream rises to the top.
Alex, some hints about your replyers...
ignore salem who just stabs and pokes at everybody, skip a lot of Cynthias lines, too long and tedious repeats of past posts, laugh loudly at Jim who'll run rings around you if you argue! Listen with heart to Pat cos that's where he speaks from. helen sounds pretty bloody confident of herself! Nigel seems quite a laugh but i don't know him or any of the others so won't comment.
This is like a school essay project, sifting and sorting.
so alex, thanks for your messages i really liked the tone and feeling, you seem to me to be really balanced about pwk and the ex pwk and K. People like you make me remember that one day I want to try this damn thing for myself!!!

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 17:01:40 (GMT)
From: Katie H
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: we have to repeat ourselves, Cerise
Message:

Sometimes I wish we didn't - sometimes I feel like I'm VERY boring - but new people come onto this forum all the time. And sometimes, people don't 'hear' replies unless they are made directly to them.

Speaking of repetition and Alex's post - I've read what seems like hundreds of posts like Alex's - and they all say pretty much the same thing. Many of them have included the same 'finger-pointing' example - you know, the three fingers pointing back at you. Not saying Alex wasn't sincere, but he's incorrect in thinking that what he had to say hadn't been said on here before - even in the last couple of weeks.

Re K - I'm kind of surprised that you have NOT 'tried it out' yet. Sounds like you've watched and still watch more than enough videos to qualify. And re the darshan line - I'm surprised that you haven't been through one of those yet if you've been to Amaroo for events.

Take care,
Katie H.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 13:38:25 (GMT)
From: Abi
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: this damn thing
Message:

Hmmmmm.

I think Cynthia is brilliant btw.

Are you going to Amaroo?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 13:58:45 (GMT)
From: cerise
Email: None
To: Abi
Subject: she may be
Message:

brilliant I just thought that it was a repeat rave if you know what I mean. I think this forum is getting too popular for people to repeat themselves.

No, i have no smartcard or K so Amaroo is off limits for me (sigh!)

seeyaAb!
c

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 08:43:16 (GMT)
From: Sherlock Holmes
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: Young Lady
Message:

You are most entertaining and charming. However something seems amiss to both myself and Watson.

Your knowledge of the cult seems a little too comprehensive for the daughter of a dope smoking spaced out premie from New Zealand. I also am wondering what the fascination is in hanging around a bunch of old fogies like us? How come your 'DAD? seems to know every premie in the Western world and yet headed for NZ back in '74?
I do enjoy your posts very much and please don't leave until you're ready but won't you come clean ?

Me thinks that like myself you are a fictional character.

Could it be that your Dad is even the big Daddy? Just a stab in the dark.

Hal

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:50:43 (GMT)
From: cerise
Email: None
To: Sherlock Holmes
Subject: Yes kind sire?
Message:

he he, what are you smoking in your pipe these days Mr Holmes??!
you must be old fogies if you think 'hanging round here' is a big deal. I hang around at least 8 sites a week. Tell you what, lets talk my favorite site, it's called Baluchitherium: My Humble Edward Van Halen Tribute. Now I totally love the guy who put this one together (better than the officila VH site) and Holmes I can tell you everything about everything that Van Halen have done or do. What would you suspect me of being on that forum, Wolfgang Van Halen? (Ed's son)

But back to your inquisition, I've been 'hanging around' you premie lot for ALL my life and have liked M for most of it.
I just don't see the need or point for the mindless corporate zeal I've seen and (mostly) heard about over the last ten years. Mum and Dad have been really upset by some fuckwits with K and they feel M has saved them from that holy church shit. As I got older they talked to me like 'What are you going to do C?' I said, 'I'm waiting that's what, cos I'm having a ball in life right now and damn sure I'm not joining any cult or club. I would like to trey K for myself though no matter wht everyone tells me here. It's like gossip, on the VH site about a new song, I have to hear the damn thing myself before I KNOW, I don't care what anyone says about anyone, it's my life and I'm finding out for myself.

As for the line..'daughter of a dope smoking spaced out premie from New Zealand'. where do you get that from? dad went to NZ then came here. The spaced out premie dope cadet is in your imagination again. He's a very together dude thanks!
If you're trying to get him to write to you, you'll have to wait, he's off to Amaroo this Monday and won't be back until after April.

Yea my knowledge of the cult is very big, I've probably met and had curry with more instructors, honchos, groovers, naughty pwk, holy pwk, freaked out pwk than you've ever seen. I've hung around M a bit when he was walking around the Amaroo site checking it out years ago, he was really funny and very nice to me, I don't think it was darshan like that, he was just a normal dude and the same height as I was then!!
so yea, what would you like to know about next? I can cover the early years in London, NZ and all activity here since the 70's, I admit most of the information is mum and dad's but I refuse to be treated like an imposter just because I was too young to become famous pwk's like all you are. You'd be surprised to know how many of US there are, I know over 20 pwk kids who are my friends and we could tell you stories (mainly of our parents) that would make your pipe smoke straighten up real fast! I think i better find the pic of me (in stroller) at Hans Jayanti 1979 (you can see the crowds around the place) and then post one of me now except that you'll think I'm showing off.
I don't know if 'suspicion' is rife here but I'd like it to be known that of the 8 websites I belong to this is the only one where my identity has been questioned. What does that mean?? search me sherlock!
By the way the single JUMP by Van Halen is 119 on the ALL TIME BEST songs ever recorded, pretty bloody amazing eh? Edward wanted to make the keyboard intro 20 minutes long but the record company said no-one would buy it. Edward said recently that no-one outside of family has ever heard his BEST work cos it isn't 'commercial'. What a suckface shallow world. They said at school'What's a chick like you following a guitar hero for, Madonna not good enough? Well folks, Madonna is the QUEEN!!! and I was brought up on her as well, and Kylie our own Aussie Princess!! BTW: dad is a very good guitarist and he knows heaps of musos, some very famous ones, he used to film bands in Sydney.What do you want to know next Sherlock? I know about almost EVERYTHING!!! Don't worry, dad said that after Am2001 he'll probably come back and speak to the forum, he told me people will accuse me of being him - and as usual he's right!

Sorry for raving but there's no more posts to me so I'm off to icq now because my frind mindbinder is predicting an all out middle eastern war soon because Saddamm H is making a Jerusalem Liberation Army of 20 Divisions!! He (mb) reckons there'll be a huge war between Arabs and Jews very very soon that could become WW3 cos the chinese are talking to Iran about stuff. So, I wouldn't take anything spoken here too seriously, it ain't that important to the BIG picture!!
Thanks for the kind words Sherlock and I don't care who you are (as long as your nice to me!!!)
lol
C

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 17:24:20 (GMT)
From: Hal (Sherlock )
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: Ok I'm on the wrong track again !
Message:

Sorry ,

I thank you for your wonderful post and explanation.

I love your posts so I humbly beg you to stick around. If I wasn't an old fogie I'd be having fantasies about meeting you.

You are such a lovely personality to have here on the fogie forum.

Wishing you joy and continuing freedom.

Love
Steve Mulley aka hal

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 06:09:15 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: Cerise, you sure have it figured out
Message:

You said Alex sounds like a good guy. I thought so too. You also said: ''People like you (Alex) make me remember that one day I want to try this damn thing for myself!!!''

You can find the actual techniques here on EPO or on websites about kriya yoga, raja yoga, jnana yoga or kundalini yoga (different names used by different people for the same thing.)

But the big thing with the kriyas (techniques) is that they are useless without what Rev Rawat calls Knowledge which is the vibe that comes from meditating. The Hindus call the vibe that is given when the techniques are shown shaktipat or energy transfer (contact high.)

Your mom and dad can probably show you how to meditate if they enjoy it. Rev Rawat makes lots of bucks out of keeping them secret and telling premies not to show people but I believe that it should be free and that we can show them to anyone we want to. Rawat turned something that was free and beautiful into a money-making religion. Ask you mom and dad to show you.

But that will still never make you a premie because the other big thing is darshan which I hope you never have because it is bad juju. That is when you see the guru as god because of the love and faith you have in him. That is the voodoo that we are all trying to recover from.

To me it is better to have faith in yourself and trust yourself. I never liked or trusted priests and others who tried to tell me they can show you god.

If we needed somebody else to show us god that means this universe is a nasty trick. We don't need anybody else except ourselves to be complete.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 22:39:13 (GMT)
From: alex
Email: None
To: Pat Conlon
Subject: Cerise, you sure have it figured out
Message:

hi pat, cerise,

great posts.
last thing first.' if we needed somebody else to show us god. ' even if it is your mom or pop it is still somebody else if you want to know the techs. we just were not born with it and in a way it is very unusual. we expect our happiness to come through our actions externally. when we start going inside it is a radical turnaround, literally.
just a couple of things. whatever i say is about here and now. it is part of my own evoulution. so i am benefitting from it and the discussion that is taking place. so thanks to all of you. couple of points. knowledge is not beeing sold. i never paid money for it nor do i know of anybody who did. however it was never free. people used to wait for it for years and years. why? it is not just 4 techniques. incidentally i knew those too from books but it did not do me any good. why? i did not know that those were THE THING which brings me to my other point. pat you mention krya yoga. that is about the techniques. raja yoga is the complete buffet. everything included ( karma yoga, tantra yoga blah blah blah ) or to put it another way this is about life, everything included nothing excluded.
jnana yoga is about discrimination and understanding which is where i feel most people are unclear. to quote 'to think is gods gift to us, what we think about is our gift to ourselves'
and no, mind ( the great good ol devil? ) is not equal to thinking. which brings me to a point i think is crucial. all this stuff has come out of india and similar places ( i love lao tsu for example ). most translations have been inaccurate in as much that when people say bhakti in india they mean something very different than when people in the west say devotion. how do i know? i live with an indian person who is involved in translating texts and we have many many discussions about all that. actually even the big m. addressed the issue in the last event in portland. ( yes i was there and had a lot of fun ) devotion in the west has the implication of being blind. it is part of our judeo christian tradition which is IMHO very warped and gross. knowledge and everything associated with it i.e. life is subtle, delicate, is a dance. so easy to miss. we in the west want to measure, weigh, prove. anyway i don't want to ramble on. my spelling please forgive. i do run spell check but sometimes i forget. and my native tongue is not english.

have fun
alex

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:35:03 (GMT)
From: cerise
Email: None
To: Pat Conlon
Subject: well sort of, not quite
Message:

not really in fact!! I learned at school how to 'sound' like I know what's going on cos that's what get a pass in exams, I can appear to know but not really know.
I know the K techniques but nothing happens except I hear my mind chattering away like a monkey, it's an annoying feeling so I stop. This contact high sounds alright!!
I had darsan at hans J in florida with mum, he drove by her a few times. Do you think I felt something and want to get to know him better? Sometimes i feel like that, a kind of connection. On the videos I get a good buzz from him talking (when I'm not looking around at the guys in the room..) and other times he seems very insistent about stuff and really arrogant like he's a big time dude who knows and we don't.
you know what his favorite saying is???...

DON'T YOU KNOW??? and I feel like saying..'NO I don't!!!'
C

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 13:13:18 (GMT)
From: Abi
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: contact high + Indian food =
Message:

Hi Cerise,

so you had 'darshan' in Florida. I thought you said you were two at the time...

About this 'contact high' associated with darshan. I'm sure if people touched Madonna/Beck/Elvis/Lennon/ etc they'd get high too. It's the star aura thing doncha know. If you were a celeb then maybe people would get high touching, being near you too.

Listen, I'm afraid I have to tell you that Rawat is in fact a mere human being. Which means he eats, sleeps, suffers the occassional bout of constipation, passes wind (maybe even when he's giving darshan), burps (again maybe even when giving darshan - I think it's called Holy Breath), probably looks at himself naked in the mirror and thinks 'gee whiz maybe I should cut back on eating so much', gets in bad moods and nags his wife, is nagged by wife, brushes his teeth, scratches himself, shaves, etc. Human, all too human.

What would you do if he farted when you were having darshan? Think about it, visualise it and then accept the reality that countless premies have in fact been there when the Lord of the Universe passed wind as they kissed his feet.


Abi

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:05:01 (GMT)
From: cerise
Email: None
To: Abi
Subject: sure i had darshan Abi, like I said
Message:

i was two at the time, Mum spent hours walking me around the site in my stroller. She passed M a few times and went all gooeyee.
i didn't do the line or anything but I'd like to see what it's like from my own view one day.
c

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 14:24:04 (GMT)
From: Abi
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: whatever...
Message:

rrrrrrrrrr

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 10:07:57 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: pdconlon@yahoo.com
To: cerise
Subject: Cerise, here are the answers to your questions
Message:

You said: I had darsan at hans J in florida with mum, he drove by her a few times. Do you think I felt something and want to get to know him better?

You may have picked up you mother's excitement and you probably picked up the crowds excitement. He's got a very good act with some powerful old-fashioned yoga juju going. It's known as Bhakti yoga. He also thinks that he is Krishna.

He does not say this in the west but hints at it but he says it straight out to the Indians. They think differently from us and worship people and cows and snakes and also have the worst form of apartheid called the caste system. They marry off their daughters when they are two and sell there children into slavery. There are more slaves in India than anywhere else in the world.

The juju that he does is accepted as normal among Indians who don't mind mob hysteria and mass hypnosis. They also have very active imaginations and worship 3,000 gods. Primitive, darling. Too, too atavistic for westerners.

So, yes, you may have felt something but you can get the same feeling by doing tantric sex and having a terrific orgasm with someone whom you trust and respect. That's the same feeling as bhakti and it's best to keep it between consenting adults in the privacy of your own home.

When it's done in a crowd it's kind of cheap and definitely not classy. Also the whole idea of having some silly human being to worship as a Master is dumb, undemocratic and downright boring unless you're into s and M and I'm not so it creeps me out.

You said: Sometimes i feel like that, a kind of connection. On the videos I get a good buzz from him talking (when I'm not looking around at the guys in the room..) and other times he seems very insistent about stuff and really arrogant like he's a big time dude who knows and we don't.

If you think he gives good satsang you should have heard some of the old time premies. Sometimes with the Indians some old women all shrivelled up would get up and talk for an hour in Gujerati (which I do not understand) and the vibe in the room would get so high it was better than any acid I ever took. That vibe is some sort of sweet love.

If you have ever seen Rev Rawat talking into a camera directly without an audience of adoring devotees you would see that he is boring. The vibe comes from him being adored by his audience. He picks it up and goes with it. It is not in him. He is basically a very ordinary guy with a fairly good product.

Yes, the techniques are not were it's at. There are some things which I do not like to post here. If you are interested I will tell you by email. The reason is that Rev Rawat recently used a phrase that I had written to one of his instructors and I do not want him to use ideas to make his juju work better in the west. I do not agree with the idea of a master.

I've said this before but I'll say it again. I am a democrat. We are all equal. If Jesus arrived tomorrow and walked across the water to save us, I would ask her to sit on the Salvation Committee with the rest of us.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 15:07:42 (GMT)
From: cerise
Email: None
To: Pat Conlon
Subject: Thanks
Message:

that's very interesting Pat, I think I get the jist of most of your words, I feel that you , Jim and a couple of others are a little out of my intellectual league and I don't completly follow it all but that's ok. I posted a long note to Sherlock and I wanted to leave for icq but saw your post. I told him that no matter what is said about M and K I still am keen to see for myself, if you read the post It's kind of clear I think. I never take anyone's word for it on other sites because everyone's giving everyone else advice, you get immune to it after a while but that doesn't mean it's not listened to and processed like all other info.
my fingers are sore!! Do you type properly or bang down like I do on the ends of fingers? painfull...
cu P
C:)

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 22:46:36 (GMT)
From: Jim
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: Have you thought about this, Cerise?
Message:

I posted a long note to Sherlock and I wanted to leave for icq but saw your post. I told him that no matter what is said about M and K I still am keen to see for myself, if you read the post It's kind of clear I think. I never take anyone's word for it on other sites because everyone's giving everyone else advice, you get immune to it after a while but that doesn't mean it's not listened to and processed like all other info.

In order to supposedly 'get k' from Maharaji you have to prove that you're thoroughly indoctrinated in the cult belief system. That's what all the videos are about and that's what the careful, careful screening process is for too. You can't approach any of this with your arms crossed. You can't keep your thoughts to yourself. And those thoughts that you're forced to share better not be doubts about Maharaji. If so, you're not ready. Watch another month or so of videos.

That's how one receives k. And that's what you want to do one day? You might just as well say that you want to become a cult member in order to see for yourself what it's like. Otherwise, like others have mentioned, if you want the techniques, they're on the net. No big deal, just a lot of hindu hype.

So which is it: do you want the techniques or do you want to try being a cult member?

Return to Index -:- Top of Index

Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 18:53:42 (GMT)
From: Pat Conlon
Email: None
To: cerise
Subject: Cerise: Rawat is perfect and Hitler loved Jews
Message:

You said: ''I feel that you, Jim and a couple of others are a little out of my intellectual league and I don't completly follow it all but that's ok.''

I'm not an intellectual. I'm an old fogey armchair yogi. Jim, yes, he's an egghead and he has some discussions here with the other eggheads that really are way over my head and I would have to have a dictionary handy to look up every other word. Perhaps there were one or two words you had to look up to understand my post. I hope you weren't too lazy and just decided to brush me off.

You have made it pretty clear that no one can put ideas into your head. I am not trying to convince you of anything. I know that, if you are anything like my son, that you do not trust anything completely except your own experience and you'll figure things out for yourself. Your generation isn't as gullible as us old hippies burnt out on acid that Rev Rawat caught in his trap 30 years ago. So I know you'll be fine.

You said in a response to another post: ''Mum and Dad have been really upset by some fuckwits with K and they feel M has saved them from that holy church shit.''

With thinking like that then I guess we can let Hitler off the hook. He was NOT responsible for sending 6 million Jews to the gas chambers. It was just his Nazi fuckwits who must have misinterpreted what he said when he told them, ''I love Jews.''

They thought he said, ''I love Jews for breakfast.'' So they roasted them for him. Yeah right Hitler was not to blame for the organization that grew up around him. No, he was a vegetarian saint who really wanted to save the Jews but his mindless fuckwit Gestappo misinterpreted him.

Rev Rawat is as responsible for creating ''that holy church shit'' as Hitler was for killing Jews. The ''holy church'' is his creation.

Return to Index -:- Top of Index